I’m not a speed demon – will go fast on groomers, but off-piste far more measured. I consider myself a strong intermediate-early advanced skiier on west coast all-mountain terrain (5’6″ 150lbs). The Ripstick is lighter and more maneuverable, while the Bonafide is heavier and more stable. Yeah, I’d go 181 cm. Could you tell me the difference in the ride of the ripstick 96 black and the ripstick 96 regular? Chairlift Chat is the official blog of Skiessentials.com. 2018 Elan Ripstick 96 174cm . Right now the suggested length for myself is 181 cm but where I am looking they only have 174 cm or 188 cm…soo the million dollar question is which size, go up to 188 or down to 174…I like fast but love to make great carving turns as well…I said fast right…help…, We’ve got them with bindings! New 2020 Elan Ripstick 96 Skis 188cm Sale: $449.91 44% Off $800.00 Free US Shipping Skiing Is For Lovers Sale Item New 2021 Elan Ripstick 96 Skis 180cm Sale: $649.99 19% Off $800.00 Free US Shipping New 2021 Elan Ripstick 96 Skis w Bindings 180cm Sale: $848.94 21% Off $1075.00 Free US Shipping Elan’s Ripstick 96 is very impressive in this "All Mountain light - back" category, and just missed the top of the podium. The men's Elan Ripstick 96 skis have are excellent freeride skis for those looking for lightweight sticks that are equally versatile for smooth skiing in all snow conditions. The innovators at Elan are always tinkering, and the Ripstick is packed with proprietary technologies. Ski Statistics - Length (cm) / Sidecut (mm) / Radius (m) 167 / 135-96-110 / 14.9 174 / 135-96-110 / 16.2 181 / 135-96-110 / 18 188 / 135-96-110 / 19.5. I think you’ll be just fine on the 181 cm. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. curious on your thoughts. The Ripstick is perfectly appropriate for taking off the groomers into trees and powder, I would say the Rustler 10 is just a little bit better in those conditions. The Ripstick 96 uses the best technology and lightest weight materials with a modern shape and taper design that make it a perfect choice for every day, on any mountain. I’m 6’1” and 200 lbs. So many great skis to choose from. Check it out! I would swear if I just thought about turning they turned. Freeskier Rating 8.61 /10. I consider myself an all mountain skier. Graphics are important, but overall ski performance is too! The catalog only lists the dimensions for the 180 cm, but it also notes that the 180 and 172 cm are both 92 mm at the waist. Home / Gear / Skis / Elan Ripstick 96 Skis 2017-2018. BEST FOR: Advanced explorers. I partially tore my ACL and LCL last spring and look forward to get back into skiing and to reduce risk, have decided to stay away from more challenging runs and jumps. This is good for a workout but I’m there to carve it up and have fun! Power if I’m lucky. SE. Hi, It’s actually available in limited quantities right now too. I did a couple of runs just testing them. The Ripstick 96 could work nicely. Elan’s Ripstick 96 is very impressive in this "All Mountain light/Freeride" category, and just missed the top of the podium. Good (no more, no less) weight distribution, versatile, happy on all terrains, it scored well for its great responsiveness that makes it incredibly playful underfoot and great fun in the powder and soft snow. or Best Offer +$50.00 shipping. Haven’t tried the Ripstick, but like how light and nimble they sound. You’ll have more confidence, and although I agree with the shop that they ski short, they’re still pretty stable, so I think you’ll appreciate the lighter weight and increased maneuverability of the shorter length. SE. Check out our wide selection of third-party gift cards. Depending on the edge you give them they will cut big s curve or more edge and they are quick turning. You’ll love the light weight maneuverability of the new stuff. Elan Ripstick 96 2018 Ski Review. I think it would be a fun tele ski. In soft snow, the outside edges will slide along the surface creating a super-smooth effect. It’s lighter and a little softer flexing, so a little easier. They also make the 96 in a “Black” edition which comes with an extra sheet of carbon for stiffness. That said, if you’re looking to slow down a bit, it might be worth considering the non-HP version of the FX 95. It was a mix of early conditions crud, ice, groomers Unfortunately no great powder. >> Read our full guide to the best all mountain skis of 2018 Where to Buy the Elan Ripstick 106 Skis. $325.00. I like tree skiing through the glades when there is enough snow at Deer Valley. I currently am skiing the rossignol experience 78 174cm which is way too heavy but good for carving on groomers and icy days. On hard snow, they inside edges hold perfectly. If you’re truly spending more time ripping groomers all day, the Bonafide is a better choice of the two. I’m looking at this ski as well as the Blizzard Rustler 10. Your summer dreams of shredding the steeps come alive this winter when you ride the Ripstick 96 Ski from Elan. The Ranger 98 Ti is a little bit more powerful and more stable at speed than the Ripstick 96, while the Ripstick feels a little bit lighter and a little quicker. Any suggestions ? Elan has a whole slew of new skis for 2018 with the Ripstick 96 sitting smack dab in the middle of their freeride line in terms of the range of widths. I’d give the Elan’s the edge as far as an all-mountain ski, while the Heads do an awesome job on-trail even given their width. No real jumps or park use. 6’2″ and 215# ski patrol. Bought the 2 days ago. All mountain freeride with a racing background. Deciding between Ripstick 96 and Line Vision (new) or Supernatural 94. Good times follow the Ripstick, and this award winning series is the best of both worlds: effortless in powder and rips the hard pack. Elan Ripstick 96, length 181: I liked these, but not as well as the Mantras. Customers also viewed these products. I also demoed the Great Joys last winter and enjoyed them on the powder. Just wondering if the 106’s aren’t as maneuverable as the 96’s? The Elan Ripstick 106 skis have become a popular option for advanced skiers looking to plow their way down the slopes. The Rustler 10 is definitely more of a freeride-inspired shape, while the Ripstick 96 leans a little more towards firm snow performance. I don’t feel currently that they are very short, I would say I am a mid intermediate and I enjoy the fact that with the shorter length comes better manoeuvrability. Anything will be an upgrade from my current, heavy Nordica Olympia Victories. Let me know what you think. It has a nice even flex pattern from tip to tail. and then Bam. Elan has a whole slew of new skis for 2018 with the Ripstick 96 sitting smack dab in the middle of their freeride line in terms of the range of widths. Lighter weight, a nice even flex pattern that doesn’t feel stiff, but still stays stable. Ha! Elan Ripstick 96 Skis 2018 - 174cm 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 rating. We were excited to find out what our testers thought of these new skis and are happy to report they received some high praise. Ski Review for 2017/18. So that is why I’m not considering the 106’s. I found a good deal on these Ripstick 96 (174cm) and was wondering whether you think these will be too long for me? Strengths: Quickness/Maneuverability, Versatility, Playfulness. Have fun! Do you typically prefer softer or stiffer skis? I prefer quick and agile skis in general and head for the trees whenever I can. In my opinion the Ripstick 96 feels a little quicker and more energetic while the Pinnacle 95 feels damper and smoother. Overall I would focus on which flex profile sounds right for you. If they do change, it’s extremely subtle. I had old atomic that weighed a ton. Considering the turn radius changes slightly between those two lengths I’m guessing the dimensions stay exactly the same. Get your Ripstick Black Edition Skis at Peter Glenn: https://www.peterglenn.com/product/elan-ripstick-black-edition-skis … But didn’t have the chance to try the Nordica Enforcer! I would love a ski that can carve short, (mostly) medium, and long radius turns but I would like a ski that I can take into the bumps, floats on powder when the opportunity is there and have some fun there also. The Elan 96 Ripstick (maybe the Black edition if recommended) and the Nordica Enforcer 93. Overall, yes, they’ll feel similar in length to the Atris. Thank you for these helpful reviews and advice! lol Please help? Had a blast a few years ago on Supernaturals. LENGTHS: 167, 174, 181, 188 * RADIUS: 18@181 * SIDECUT: 134-96-113 * $649. Our women testers loved the Ripsticks, and again this season in the 2019 test if you want even more feedback. I’ll be out West next month and would like to use a wider ski and wanting to still be able to use it in the east. What do you think? After reading this, I’m torn between the 163cm Ripstick 94W and the Head Great Joy. The 188 cm is going to feel a little more stable at speed, the 181 cm is going to feel a little more maneuverable. Turn, turn, turn one million short skidding turns to the bottom of a long groomer. These skis are based on Elan’s new Amphibio tech that uses specifically shaped core profiles for the left and right ski. He described it as a “super playful medium to short turn ripper.” He also found the Ripstick 96 really adapted well to different snow conditions. ***** It's wide enough to handle powder yet narrow enough in the waist to rip up the front side. Buy Now From Elan “This ski pretty much skied itself,” said one tester alluding to the Ripstick 96’s ease of use. Would you recommend the ripstick 96 for this type of skiing or something like volkl revolt 95 ski? I am 5’10, 160 lbs. Are you thinking about getting the HP version or the non-HP version (metal vs no metal)? I’m 177cm/74kg, good skier trying to figure out, which length of the Ripstick 96 I should choose using it as a all season touring/free touring ski. (I tend to pick my way through the soft/deep stuff and blast straight down groomers, if that helps any). Ski Style: Adaptable, versatile, ex-competitive mogul skier. When it comes to carving, the Elan Ripstick 96 absolutely rips. I really like to rip down the groomers on nice days. My previous skis are 170 all mountain skis and are heavy with bindings that don’t have vertical release on the front section(which is partly why I’m buying new skis). The black has extra carbon, so is stiffer and more responsive–certainly a higher-performing ski especially on groomers at high speeds. Thanks for the advice! Thanks for any insight. Mike definitely felt this too, commenting that it was “easy to pivot, would be really fun in the trees.” Mike thinks the ski is going to be best described as an “all mountain off-piste ski with plenty of versatility.”. I skied them on Sunday morning, when there was more soft snow, and promptly searched out some knee-deep powder. I know that Nordica is a little bit stiffer! Skiing Brahma 188 currently – too heavy and stiff/not playful enough, though decent on hard and ice. Watch; Elan Ripstick 94 Women's Skis 2019. These skis have been raved about by both experts and enthusiasts, with a number of these skis being sold out at retailers. I am comparing this ski to the Nordica Enforcer 93 and need some advise as I am still not sure that the 96 Ripstick will hold on ice. I demoed a pair of Elan 86 Ripsticks last weekend. Pre-Owned. Currently skiing older G3 Rapid Transits which are asymmetrical using NTN binding system. SE. SE, I’m considering the Elan Ripstick 96(ok, dead set on them) as I currently own a pair of Elan’s 14 TI’s 172 cm. I and am not much into high speeds any longer and only plan on occasionally heading off piste and would like a ski that can still offer some decent floatation in fresh snow. If you’re looking for a wider carving ski, then this is a great choice, but if you’re looking for a ski that can do it all, the Revolt is pretty slick. They have a different feel overall. info@skiessentials.com. They’re pretty stable for how light they are, so you’ll love the performance of the 174 as well as the maneuverability. 181 cm could work too if you prefer shorter skis. Each of testers skied the 181 cm length. Hi . Elan Ripstick 96 Skis 2017-2018. I’m thinking 181 for either ski. I read tons of reviews and landed on this ski. He admitted that he “thought I was gonna find it too wimpy after the first couple turns, but found that I could actually trust it to hold an edge and swing me back across the hill.” Joe thought it had excellent “soft snow float and ultra-nimble quickness” in addition to its ability to hold an edge. They worked well enough, and did everything I asked, but they just didn't seem like they were as much fun. I want a lighter and wider more playful ski for powder days, groomers and even the park but also want to be able to hold a good edge when necessary. The Elan Ripstick 96 is fit for Soft Snow, All Mountain conditions, and West Coast skiing. Currently unavailable. I think it would be a great ski for Maine! Mike Anglin found them to be incredibly quick and playful, scoring the Ripstick 96 5 out of 5 for quickness, playfulness, as well as versatility. Hi Jen C! Both of these skis will be a serious upgrade over the Olympia. I’m thinking of FX 95. Time left 2d 23h left. I’m 5’10”, (178 cm), about 200Lbs, advanced to expert and pretty much ski all terrains with most of the season skiing in the East. The ski is very light, easy to unweight, liked that also. The asymmetrical rocker profile is super interesting and definitely achieves what it was designed to do. They are a light, nimble ski, very easy to engage turns with them. The Ripstick is really a great ski for you. We think Mike Thomas described the Ripstick 96 really well and we agree with him that it’s going to be a blast to ski in the trees. In my opinion it comes down to how aggressive you are. I’m 6’1″ and around 180lbs, I’m intermediate to advanced skier and have been skiing for nearly 35 years, but really heavy the last 5 years. It’s also heavier, a little bit more powerful, has better vibration damping and stability at high speeds, etc. You’ll lose a bit on the flotation, but everything’s a compromise, right? The Ripstick 86 is a brand new ski for Elan going into 2018 and is the narrowest in their new Freeride collection. I am looking at the Ripstick Black. Essentially the inside edge of the ski uses a more cambered shape to ensure edge grip and stability while a more rockered outer edge allows for quick adjustments and seamless turn initiation. What length would you suggest. I believe the 172 cm Rustler 9 shares the same dimensions with the 180 cm: 127.5/92/117 mm. Let us know if you have any other questions! We do have some 172 cm in stock, but they don’t list the dimensions on the ski, just waist width (unless I’m blind). Would it offer the snappiness I like and yet offer enough floatation in fresh snow? I think you’ll be just fine. I have a 2 year old pair of Volkl Code S skis now and love carving these nice wonderful short turns on steep groomer slopes but that’s all they are good for other than possibly hitting some racing gates on a SL course. Pre-opening at Breckenridge. Would you be able to tell me what the side cut dimensions are for the 172 cm ? Hi, I’m looking at buying the womens version of the Ripstick for an all mountain ski. Hi Kent! The Ripstick 96 is, as you could have guessed, 96 under foot making the Something to consider…. The Ripstick, however, is a little quicker edge to edge on groomers. They will give a spectacular ride no matter where you are on the mountain. The FX 95 is awesome. Hope that helps! Elan Ripstick 96 owner here, I have them in the 181 length. It uses a fair amount of rocker and early taper, so skis a little short. Elan Skis Size Chart and Sizing Guide. I’m looking for an all mountain wide ski that can handle the groomers and moderate bumps but also powder up to about 14-16 “. That's a lot of caps, but Elan doesn't always get the word of mouth they deserve (many of their best efforts are other companies' skis that they actually build). But I’m uncertain for the climbing part with kick turns in difficult terrain. In other words, Elan didn’t disproportionately stiffen up the longest length of the Ripstick 106. Do you think I’ll find these too hard to turn? I don’t have the legs I once had that could force a slalom turn on a GS ski and need something else and at this age. Very intuitive. So, you probably already know the benefits of each length. So much fun in the moguls, so light and easy to throw around and floats extremely well in the powder too but on a long groomer runs all one can do is skid turns. The Ripstick 96 also uses quite a lot of tip rocker, which makes the longer lengths feel a little more maneuverable and more forgiving as well. I definitely think the 177 cm is the way to go if you’re coming off a 178 cm Atris. I can’t decide between the 96 or 106. The Ripstick 96, the page that you’re commenting on here, would also be a really good choice if you’re trying to slow down and get a slightly more forgiving ski. If a smootheness indicator existed for skis, the Ripstick 96 would chart at 100%! This is an overview of the Elan ski size chart. The Amphibio Technology shows its quality in groomed and hard snow carving, where the asymmetrical skis make getting into and out of a turn absolutely automatic. I think the 96 is a more versatile ski if you’re looking for something to cross over between east cost skiing and western skiing. A lot of the description and shape are similar. Most fans of Blizzard skis have really responded well to the Rustler 9. As a kid I skied moguls and now miss that. The Ripstick is a little more forgiving too. Of course, it might not be so cut and dry, but think about your own skiing. The bonafide has such great reviews and I’m not seeing much on tip chatter and speed with the Ripstick. Have been skiing since a kid. Of course the 106 has the edge in powder, but I would go with the 96 if it’s your everyday all mountain ski. On our test days we saw some firm, frozen snow up top with softer, spring-like snow at the bottom. I currently use my Black Crows Atris’s pretty much everywhere and I’d like something a bit more versatile for the mediocre snow days! We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock. Thanks, Hey Zach! New (Other) $750.00. The 106 would be a little clunky in moguls, just a bit wide for that type of terrain, unless there’s a bunch of soft snow. Both are a lot of fun, both very capable all mountain skis, but in my opinion that’s where you’d feel the biggest difference. It is a true freeride ski that doubles as an all-mountain ski for those who want ultimate versatility on the mountain. Hi Paul! Have fun! Camber on the working edge combined with rocker on the feathering edge enhances ease. If you are venturing off-trail or want a more playful ski, the Ripstick is a great tool. Good (no more, no less) weight distribution, versatile, happy on all terrains, it scored well for its great responsiveness that makes it incredibly playful underfoot and great fun in the powder and soft snow. I currently have the 163cm 2012 ace of spades by Nordica ( I’m not a great park skier but managed to get a very good deal on these so I went for them). Kastle did make some subtle changes to the FX line from your 94 to the current 95. And airy tip inserts reduce swing weight. I feel like Superman. Hope that helps! I loved the Rossi Soul 7 HD but want something a little more versatile for a single-ski quiver. Some early racing dna in my background so the majority of my skis have been GS racing skis. You’re right, however, that they are pretty similar skis. I would like to know how you would compare the Ripstick to the bonafide? I spend most of the time on the groomers but would like to venture into the soft stuff more. I live on the east coast but will be skiing in Colorado for a good 2 weeks in February. I don’t know if I should buy the 181 or the 188. Or do you typically ski at more moderate speeds and make more turns? Watch; 2020 Elan Ripstick 96 Black Edition Skis with Shift MNC 13 Bindings - New. I’m 5ft8 strong skier and am comfortable on my 178 length Atris’s, so I’m looking at the 177 Ripstick W and wondering whether they will feel similar in terms of length? As Joe Cutts commented, it’s so maneuverable that its level of edge grip is somewhat surprising, but when you lock that inside edge into the snow it definitely holds. You could probably even justify getting the longest length, the 188 cm. In order to find the right size ski from Elan, use your height, and skill level to narrow down your size.During your selection please consider your weight when deciding on a ski size. I would worry the 181 cm would be challenging to maneuver, but I wouldn’t worry about a lack of stability in the 174 cm at all. Hi It’s amazing because even though they are lighter, they remain quite stable. I’m really interested in the Ripstick 96. It is built using their new TNT technology that uses a wood core with vapor tip inserts to reduce weight. I think you’ll love the E93, it’s incredibly versatile and a strong performer on hard groomers. I did like the Elan Amphibio tech. 2018 Elan Ripstick 116 Downhill Skis /Attack 13 bindings - 193cm skiied one day. 2018 All Mountain Ski The Elan Ripstick 96 is fit for Soft Snow, All … The ski shop recommends 174 (they claim these ripsticks handle like shorter skis due to the long rocker) but I’m still leaning towards 167. Good (no more, no less) weight distribution, versatile, happy on all terrains, it scored well for its great responsiveness that makes it incredibly playful underfoot and great fun in the powder and soft snow. I am torn between these 2 so I would really be interested in how the Ripstik compares to the Fischer ranger T1 98. Like the Ripstick 96, the Ripstick 106 is a pretty light ski for its size (and especially for a ski that’s said to perform well in the resort). I love the sweet spot in the 84s. 2018 Elan Ripstick 96 Skis If there has ever been an all-mountain, lightweight ski that boasts the newest technology, then the 2018 Elan Ripstick 96 is a definite option for you. If you wanted to go even wider you could even consider getting a Rustler 10. 0 bids +$26.48 shipping. Any thoughts on ski length for a smaller aggressive skier? But I really like the color on the 106’s. The result is a ski that screams versatility, especially considering its 96 mm waist width. The shop suggested the 181 but I think that would be too long and from the website it looks like the 174 would be a better fit. I know I’m asking a lot from a ski. Elan’s Ripstick 96 is very impressive in this "All Mountain light/Freeride" category, and just missed the top of the podium. Tryed the Ripstick….it is a great ski….allso in powder! Shop now. How would you say they compare? Have you tried any other skis? If you’ve been enjoying skiing a 169 cm length, 167 cm really isn’t far off that at all. I’m worried if I go with the 188 that they are going to be too long, but I also worry that since the general consensus is that these skis ski short the 181’s won’t be right? what do you think compared to the Pinnacle 95? The Elan Ripstick 96 comes in at a very low weight (even for a “50/50” ski), and it also features a unique rocker profile concept. But the skidding is not my style, I ski mostly on packed snow and ice. Blizzard has a new ski for 2019: the Rustler 9. I think the 174 cm length is more appropriate for your size. I’d consider myself a strong intermediate skier. In my opinion, that length isn’t going to be too challenging for kick turns or when you need to make other tight maneuvers when touring. Have fun! I’m currently skiing on the 2018 Titan & the 2015 Brahma, I really like the confidence both these skis provide! Ski Style: Heavy-footed, a little reckless, bumps, trees, beer league, Ski Style: Aggressive All Mountain Freeride, Ski Style: Upright, fluid nimble, powerful. SE. Have fun! Any ski with metal will ultimately hold better on ice than a non-metal ski. Manufacturers description If a smoothness indicator existed for skis, the Ripstick 96 would be off the charts! The Ripsticks unique and innovative combination of a TubeLite Woodcore, featuring tip-to-tail carbon rods, Vapor Tip inserts, and advanced composites that are integrated into the ski’s woodcore for the ultimate ride in any condition. Join Active Pass to get Ski magazine, access to exclusive content, thousands of training plans, and more. It allows for different turn shapes a little more easily, and just overall has a nice even, softer flex. Do you ski so aggressively that you would benefit from the extra stability of the 188 cm? Even smoother than ever before, easier turn initiation, still plenty of stability and power. Mostly off-piste in West and hard pack, groomers in East.