jordan peterson opinion reddit

I've seen him misquote, misinterpreted basic explanations of Derrida or Foucoult which would be better read by a first year philosophy student. We already talked about how stupid what he's saying is, but notice that Peterson doesn't believe in logic either, as he has dismissed any surface level content (e.g. He never claimed to be a philosopher. The leaps you have to go through from "phallogocentric" to a hatred of dialogue I think reveals this as nothing more than a sad political rant. edited 1 year ago. Please keep in mind that: This subreddit is meant for expert assistance, not for debate, and hosts discussion only insofar as its useful for clarifying the state of expert opinion; and. The ideas in his book aren't even original. In a Reddit thread called “I think Dr Peterson saved my life”, a 24-year-old Polish man describes how Peterson’s lectures pulled him out of self … RECOMMENDED BOOKS. As you can tell by just looking around, taking a brief bit of consideration for the absolute miracle that even a building like this represents. The black community in the United States is the 18th wealthiest community -- the 18th wealthiest nation on the planet. I would be very appreciative if someone could please explain to me why Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about, on topics ranging from gender pronouns, transgenderism, post-modernism, neo-Marxism, what have you. SELFAUTHORING.COM. Close. Jordan Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist and the author of the multi-million copy bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. I'd say the cult of science and logictm are also to blame. Jordan Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist and the author of the multi-million copy bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos. Imho they follow a cycle, you have the initial wave that creates supporters; then you have the skeptics that are attracted by such illogical demagoguery, but "the wave" is way bigger compared to them so it keeps growing, then you have the skeptical finally getting noticed more and then the cult starts to deflate. First, whereas Hicks' rejection of postmodernism is [meant to be] supported by summaries of its key figures, the book is surprisingly 'light' on exposition... [and such] cursory summaries do the history of thought and its students a serious injustice. Thanks for sharing that interview and for the write-up. Juni 1962 in Edmonton[1]) ist ein kanadischer klinischer Psychologe, Autor, Vortragsreisender und Influencer in sozialen Netzwerken. So there's not really much scholarly work to do here, beyond objecting to the quality of this kind of scholarship and pointing people to mainstream scholarship on these issues--as Lorkovic says, the crucial problem is that there isn't the kind of scholarly work backing up these theses, that is needed for a sustained and critical appraisal of them. Find more subreddits like r/JordanPeterson -- Welcome to the discourse! YOUTUBE CHANNEL. 143 votes, 47 comments. (Photo by Chris Williamson/Getty Images) Getty Images. I wonder which one it is. Jordan Peterson. The anti­–Jordan Peterson subreddit r/enoughpetersonspam is my favorite place to waste time. What does that even mean? In either case, he's psychologically unstable, by his own diagnosis. But there's no attempt to engage the mainstream scholarship to show where it errs, nor are these positions developed through a sustained engagement with the primary sources. Phenomenology, German Idealism, Early Modern Phil. and there's something pathologically wrong with a person that doesn't have any gratitude, especially when they live in what so far is the best of all possible worlds. EtcetEra Forum. 138. So Peterson's interpretation of this term seems very strange to me and doesn't seem to have any connection at all to the context in which it appears. His training is not in philosophy, though he might well have taken a class here or there. We are talking about what he say. At the time, I was only vaguely aware of Sam Harris and was not overly … Photo: Chris Williamson/Getty Images. So he doesn't explain why he's bringing up the black community, but I assume he's attempting to insinuate that black people are ungrateful and/or resentful because they are, according to his unbacked and unsourced claim, the 18th wealthiest community on the planet. Logo is logos. It’s genuinely tragic what happened to Jordan Peterson. The daughter of renowned Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson has published a photo of herself in a swimsuit on Twitter, sarcastically singling out “scurvy and vitamin deficiencies”. Jordan Peterson is low-key a Holocaust denier/"sceptic", once I learned that I was baffled as to why anyone would want to be linked with him. The root word of dialogue is logos -- again, they don't believe that people of good will can come to consensus through the exchange of ideas. Does this sound like a critique of Western civilization to you? original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXZSeiAl4PI Psychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson gives his opinion on men going their own way. So if you're not grateful, you're driven by resentment, and resentment is the worst emotion that you can possibly experience, apart from arrogance. Pot shots about "right-wing projection" and the like have no place in a reasonable discussion, regardless. Es ist ein Selbsthilfebuch des kanadischen klinischen Psychologen und Psychologieprofessors Jordan Peterson. The answer is everything, he really has no understanding whatsoever about Marxism and postmodern theories. I don't like the title because Peterson is not much of a genius. 32.5k members in the enoughpetersonspam community. Arrogance, resentment, and deceit. They believe that that notion is part of the philosophical substructure and practices of the dominant culture. They are ungrateful or resent people, and this means that there must be something wrong with them; that they are psychologically unhealthy. That's the logos. 1; 2; 3; First Prev 3 of 3 Go to page. “This is why Peterson genuinely believes in Dostoevsky’s eminent saying in The Brothers Karamazov: ‘Without God all things are permitted.'”. They should at least read the history of "How I can ignore anything on the continent and be a snub?" They believe that logic is part of the process by which the patriarchal institutions of the West continue to dominate and to justify their dominance. Instead, these threads merely say just that: that Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about. This forum is dedicated to the work associated with Jordan Peterson: a public intellectual, clinical psychologist, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. Shenan Boquet Bishops need to ‘correct’ pro-abortion Biden for ‘acting… I'm Dr Jordan B Peterson. Postmodernism, for Peterson, isn't a philosophical position, but a mysterious force that "grips" people without their knowledge. Oct 25, 2017 5,350 London. For a sentiment like those already expressed here, but in the literature, here's Lorkovic's assessment of Hicks' thesis in Philosophy in Review 25(4): Stephen R.C. Jordan Peterson “12 Rules for Life” author and clinical psychologist Jordan B. Peterson discusses free speech with YouTube’s Dave Rubin, Jan. 1, 2019. original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXZSeiAl4PI Psychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson gives his opinion on men going their own way. On Reddit, fans testify that Peterson changed, or even saved, their lives. Thanks for pointing that out, Peterson. (i) postmodernism starts with Rousseau and Kant, (ii) who are irrationalists, and (iii) it becomes popular among socialists, (iv) because socialism is inconsistent with being reasonable and so socialists are obliged to reject reason. The problem is that a reader has no basis in Hicks' text itself to assess those interpretations. I can't understand why one would "even" denounce "Categorical Imperative is evil" Kant as postmodernist when one has an almost incomprehensible "root of all authoritarianism" Hegel. Where can I find his articles about postmodernism? And yes, it would be because we “disagreed” with the opinion – we … We have already seen a few power debate techniques and we have already done a debate analysis in the the Trump VS Clinton debate. The days of Renaissance men revolutionizing multiple fields from their armchairs are over. My younger brother idolizes him, but I'm skeptical that Peterson is more than a charlatan. That is, if blacks ask to be on equal footing with whites, they are ungrateful, when they should be appreciating the fact that they have it better than people in some random other place. Oct 25, 2017 10,506 Detroit, MI. Without using any unfair debating techniques, he simply destroys his opponent by staying in control and convincing the public … More at 10. We are not talking here about how long he have account. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the enoughpetersonspam community, Continue browsing in r/enoughpetersonspam, Press J to jump to the feed. Opinion The chilling evidence that Jordan Peterson was right: transgender ideology is ‘totalitarian’ With every passing day, more and more stories … You wasted your … 245k. Instead, he's parroting common-place dismissals, and he's managed to trick of bunch of people who've read even less that he knows what he's talking about. The Jordan B Peterson Podcast (archive below) features audio versions of some of the most popular and compelling of Dr. Peterson’s YouTube videos, interviews with some of the world’s most compelling thinkers (Camille Paglia, Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt, Sam Harris, General Stanley McChrystal, Iain McGilchrist, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, among many others), lectures … Postmoderns, Peterson dogmatically asserts, are ungrateful. Please do … heroes in journey . No one thinks that, and Peterson is stacking his cards. I was recently the subject of a Sunday Times cover story written by Decca Aitkenson. The remark was made on her father’s Instagram page, as the Canadian professor published an unedited audio recording of the interview he and Mikhaila held with The Sunday … So now Peterson is saying, yeah, there's relative poverty, I'm not that much of an asshole, but it's "very difficult to deal with." Finally, I am the author … He puts things imprecisely and sometimes downright wrong - his interpretation of Heidegger in the Introduction to 12 Rules , for example, is highly contentious and I can't imagine many Heidegger scholars would recognises … Okay, since people said I wasn't reading Jordan Peterson, I went and read the guy, and here's a line-by-line critique. I don't know anything about any of these fields, so citations and reading suggestions would also be very appreciated. Remember, Western culture is Phallogocentric. Das Buch enthält abstrakte ethische Prinzipien über das Leben, die von Biologie, Literatur, Religion, Mythen, klinischer Erfahrung und … original source: https://youtu.be/7XtEZvLo-Sc?t=9m24sPsychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson expresses his frustration with atheists like Sam Harris. For the record, I know next to nothing about the guy, other than that you guys seem to dislike him. The Canadian psychology professor first … It is an important political economic issue, and it is very difficult to deal with. 776. harrowing through hell. Here's a helpful article on why he is misinforming people about legislation relating to trans people and "gender pronouns". Jordan Peterson barked the question at us through a perma-squint, like a character in a Western. He's a psychologist. Or does he have a book or something about it? In 2013, Jordan Peterson told me about Quora so I joined and Peterson was the first person I followed. On postmodernism, apparently Peterson is getting his account of it from Hicks' Explaining Postmodernism. Peterson knows what he's doing. Nearly everything that comes out of psychologist mouths is pseudoscientific social psychology, when it's not it's when they aren't speaking as psychologists. My younger brother idolizes him, but I'm skeptical that Peterson is more than a charlatan. "black lives matter") as a manifestation of an emotion ("black people are ungrateful"). Good thing to keep in mind when humanities students get all smug about how science doesn't teach critical thinking. Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist from Canada. Moral of story: no one should ever point out problems in a society anywhere, because we can always point to a worse problem somewhere else. Okay, they don't believe in logic. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the askphilosophy community. Hence, white privilege. can be "really justified". Press J to jump to the feed. It's worth pointing out that, by his own logic, Peterson is pointing out a problem in the greatest society ever (postmoderns), which makes him either bitter, ungrateful, or resentful towards postmoderns. They believe that logic is part of the process by which the patriarchal institutions of the West continue to dominate and to justify their dominance. If you are seriously so small to go that way instead of talking to the guy you didn't understant what Peterson was trying to say at all. … NOT IN THE SOCIAL SCIENTIFIC SENSE OR CLINICAL. They don't believe in dialogue. JORDAN B PETERSON PODCAST. If there are problems in the black community, if anyone complains about them or draws attention to them, they are ungrateful and resentful. Jordan Bernt Peterson (geboren am 12. exMage. Mikhaila Peterson’s tweet came after her father , who like Mikhaila subsists on an entirely all-beef diet, asked her “to explain it a bit” referring to an article in the Atlantic Monthly . It doesn't take more than 1 person to write a book. He doesn't explain any of these difficulties. So I guess it depends what is meant by cult of genius. Dr. Peterson is a best-selling author, professor, and clinical psychologist. That doesn't mean there is no such a thing as relative poverty, which matters. This emotion, Peterson says, shows there to be something psychologically wrong with the person. The root word of dialogue is logos -- again, they don't believe that people of good will can come to consensus through the exchange of ideas. This forum is dedicated to the work associated with Dr. Jordan Peterson: a public intellectual, clinical psychologist, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. Member. So the first thing that you might want to know about Postmodernism is that it doesn't have a shred of gratitude. The only thing interesting about the Jordan Peterson phenomenon is that is shows that bubbling beneath the anti-intellectualism of the far right, there's a craving to have academics they can call their own. And the arrogance which he talks with is so mind boggling I really start to think he's one of the most anti intellectual public figures around. There's a general science of thought or being or whatever that has to be understood before the natural sciences, history, etc. He doesn't say why he's adding "deceit" to the list. After all, interpretations need as much defense as arguments in order to be convincing. It's not hard to get at what he's trying to insinuate. So it has to be either malice or profound ignorance. That's weird, considering he was talking about this stuff before Hicks had published the book you're talking about. Jordan Bernt Peterson (born 12 June 1962) is a Canadian YouTube personality, clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. I don't get the appeal of personality cults. Rex Murphy: Jordan Peterson's personal torment . Science experimentation require more than one person due to the nature of getting the experiments together. His recent sold-out lectures in London had the atmosphere of revival meetings. I have two reservations about this text. I t has now been just over two years since the first, now-renowned debate between Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson, having taken place on June 23, 2018. logic, ethics. /u/quicksort17 /u/DSE96 /u/drunkentune /u/spudster999 /u/PepperJohn /u/Zenarchist /u/wokeupabug /u/Coltorl /u/v12wannabe /u/cookieslemons /u/im_not_afraid. S4 E5: Mark Manson and Jordan and Mikhaila Peterson Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-17T10:18:20-05:00 February 11th, 2021 | Mikhaila Peterson co-hosts this episode. However, I can't seem to actually find anything Jordan Peterson has published on either Postmodernism or philosophy. "what you see in Western culture is the consequence of the male-dominated oppressive self-serving society. The Hicks-Peterson account of the relevant philosophical developments is that (i) postmodernism starts with Rousseau and Kant, (ii) who are irrationalists, and (iii) it becomes popular among socialists, (iv) because socialism is inconsistent with being reasonable and so socialists are obliged to reject reason. This sounds like when evangelicals claimed that Pokemon was about summoning demons. If we dial back the reverence, it will be easier to keep the body of work for it's own merits instead of the (newly fallen) celebrity/persona behind it. Jan 11, 2021 #101 Patriiick said: Whenever I read about something dumb Matthew Mcconaughey does or says I have to … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The chilling evidence that Jordan Peterson was right: transgender ideology is ‘totalitarian’ Opinion By Fr. What's more, since the results of Hicks' interpretations serve as the basic premises of his subsequent critical argument, a thorough hermeneutics is indispensable. Jordan Peterson barked the question at us through a perma-squint, like a character in a Western. But only if it confirms pre existing notions. … The article claims that Peterson fails to take account of research … Jan 11, 2021 #55 Khanimus said: Because if there's someone we need to communicate with, it's Jordan fucking Peterson… 12 Rules For Life: Ordnung und Struktur in einer chaotischen Welt (englischer Originaltitel: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos) ist der deutsche Titel eines 2018 erschienenen englischsprachigen Bestsellers. In fact, a search for "Hicks Ayn Rand" shows an interview with Hicks with Randists that alleges post-modern attack on Rand. So the reason they don't let people who they don't agree with speak on campus, is because they don't agree with letting people speak. So here's what the postmodernists believe: They don't believe in the individual. I mean, he's a bit of a creative confabulator so I'll give him back, but when you peel back the fustian you just get another wannabe celebrity and right wing reactionary blowhard who really, really resents women. 3 years ago. It's not really an emotion, just a bold accusation or insinuation about postmoderns willfully intending to deceive their readers. Jordan Peterson. Jordan Peterson is polarising because he is a psychologist who often opines on fields outside of his own expertise, including philosophy. Floating a new thesis now. Mikhaila Peterson, the daughter of psychology guru and writer Jordan Peterson, slammed a newly-published Sunday Times article as “the most insensitive piece of journalism” she has ever experienced.. Member. Jordan Peterson’s Online Platform Will Shadowban Unpopular Opinions. As for 'post-modernism'--from my research it seems that Peterson essentially agrees with Stephen Hicks on the issues with this philosophical tradition that's supposed to exist. The topic of Tympan is the tendency for philosophical systems (like that of Hegel, or Heidegger) to consider philosophy as dominant over all other forms of inquiry. Write an open letter to Dr. Jordan B. Peterson (u/drjordanbpeterson). Folks, the discussion in this thread has mostly been OK, but there have been occasional detours into the realms of grandstanding, personal attacks, hot takes, and the like. The “brusque dad” shtick is very much a part of his appeal. I have posted several hundred lectures on psychological, religious and (less willingly) political matters on YouTube, where they have attracted hundreds of millions of views and no little controversy. It seems to me that Derrida's interest here is significantly more focused. Any science supporting multiple genders or pointing out that video game addiction is real is the enemy. Such intense adoration can turn nasty. And if you're bitter about everything that's happening around you, despite the fact that you're bathed in wealth, than there is something absolutely wrong with you. Let's look at one example from Peterson himself though: supposedly Derrida calls Western civilization phallogocentric, and by this he means that "what you see in Western culture is the consequence of the male-dominated oppressive self-serving society.". Okay, so what else do they believe or not believe? If postmodernism is in fact untenable, which it very well might be, Stephen Hicks has unfortunately not demonstrated that. Non-subscribers who wish to read it can sign up for two free articles a week here. On the other hand, the humanities is most invested in the Great Man model. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. They are ungrateful because they live in the greatest society ever, yet still point out problems with this society. People always ask me why he is wrong and about what. So according to Peterson, anyone who points out an existing problem in society is ungrateful. Non-subscribers who wish to read it … He was a fixture on TVO (Ontario’s publicly funded station) in the late 2000s and on; as an essayist, as a commentator, as a guest. Peterson refused to follow Canada’s C-16 bill, which established law regarding gender identity and preference. Second, although it accuses (rightly I think) postmodernism of being too polemical, Hicks' text is itself an extended polemic. They just want to be validated in their intellectual indolence. But notice that it already frames postmdoernism as a position that grips people before they are aware. He knows how to manipulate people. Now that I looked up to it, it seems that Hicks and Petersons are fond of Ayn Rand, which might explain their negativeness towards Kant. He was a libertarian who trawled Reddit and had some weird views on postmodernism. Discussion . Cookies help us deliver our Services. PERSONALITY COURSE. The irony here is that, with the advent of big science and diminishing returns of research, mass collaboration is becoming more common in science by necessity. I cannot think of any politician, thinker or novelist who has sent so much comfort and aspiration to so many people . How could Peterson have made a blunder of this magnitude? So absolute wealth is the fact that we have buildings in the west. ". Peterson does this sort of thing a lot. So again, he doesn't reject postmodernism using reasons, but because he thinks it displays an unhealthy emotional state. Well, does Derrida call Western civilization phallogocentric? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Peterson does this sort of thing a lot. That's partly the Christian word, but is also partly the root word of logic. Lowrys. I've spent 25 years as a clinical psychologist, professor and research scientist, first at Harvard and then at the University of Toronto. That's the logos. After going through the transcript, it seems like he's simply not rigorous and doesn't operate with good faith: So here's what the postmodernists believe: They don't believe in the individual. Archived *Why* are Jordan Peterson's philosophical opinions wrong? Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-01T21:56:28-05:00. Or you're an exemplar of your gender, or your sex, or your ethnicity, or you're an exemplar of however you can be classified so that you are placed in the position of a victim against the oppressor. It either blinds you or sets you up for disappointment. Go. There may be a day when we learn there was a dark side to Marie Curie or Helen Keller. Would Maps of Meaning have been able to be published in anything like its current form if JP had been forced to have a co-author? containing the works of Russell and Popper. That’s just called lying. Given the tenor of the piece … How could Peterson have made a blunder of this magnitude? Accepting that there are different facets to a person's character, behaviour and contributions to culture/human knowledge will be crucial as we rewrite history. Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-01T21:56:28-05:00 I was recently the subject of a Sunday Times cover story written by Decca Aitkenson. Since nowhere have poststructuralist thinkers talked about being ungracious (except perhaps maybe in a place where Derrida reflects upon the cultural practice of saying "thank you," but this isn't what he's talking about), he's not engaging in a criticism with them on the level of rational discourse, but claiming that their discourse is actually just a manifestation of a hidden emotion. We see this happening for every fascistoid, from Peterson to Elon Musk to even more radical haters which don't deserve to be named. “This is why Peterson genuinely believes in Dostoevsky’s eminent saying in The Brothers Karamazov: ‘Without God all things are permitted.'”. What a postmodern thing to say! But what they want from their academics is not actual instruction. There is an evil triad for you. Yet Peterson's terms are so blurry here, he seems to suggest that if we call attention to any roles, races, genders, or identities, the individual disappears. I had expected them to be making a bad version of something like the argument that Descartes' and Kant's turn to the subject leads to Nietzsche inverting morality and making all values subjective and bringing about relativism, thus requiring us to make a return to premodern values (an argument I have heard ancient and Thomistic thinkers make, one that I think comes from some of Heidegger's more conservative students, maybe Strauss; I'm not sure). But when he talks about Marxism or post-modernism, it's readily apparent he simply hasn't read original sources. An article published in 2020 in the International Journal of Jungian Studies, ′Carl Jung, John Layard and Jordan Peterson: Assessing Theories of Human Social Evolution and Their Implications for Analytical Psychology', offers a sustained critique of Peterson's thought as outlined in 12 Rules for Life. For the record, I know next to nothing about the guy, other than that you guys seem to dislike him. But I would put Jordan Peterson above anyone else when it comes to debating. Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life. By Brian Feldman. (Photo by Chris Williamson/Getty Images) Getty Images. If Jordan Peterson or Henry Kissinger submitted an essay, it would be rejected. In other words, anything a postmodern says has nothing to do with the logic or reasons behind what they say, but the underlying emotional cause of their statement. Helen Keller was a Nazi informant. Derrida's complaining about this and pointing out the fact that it's connected with a sexist bias towards equating the masculine with the reasonable or the primary. So I looked at the relevant threads on r/askphilosophy, but I don't think they really provide reasons to believe that Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about. I mean if it's Malcolm Gladwell books then, yeah, throw that baby out with the bathwater please. Instead of disproving postmodernism, Hicks dismisses it; instead of taking postmodernism seriously and analyzing it carefully on its terms, Hicks oversimplifies and trivializes it, seemingly in order to justify his own prejudice against postmodernism. Jordan Peterson also spreads the nazi conspiracy theory that … He began to receive widespread attention in the late 2010s for his views on cultural and political issues. Instead, he moves on from this "difficult problem" to more pressing matters: Western societies have been absolutely remarkable in their ability to generate and distribute wealth. Which now, when people are airing their grievances against influential thinkers/artists, turns into a clusterfuck. I released the full audio of the interview on YouTube here so that anyone interested could find out for themselves what was actually said. That's partly the Christian word, but is also partly the root word of logic. Many letters have great public … It's hard to imagine this being a simple misunderstanding since the word civilization doesn't appear in the essay called Tympan a single time. Again, the irony, since Peterson doesn't believe that anyone he deems "ungrateful" has a right to complain. Renaissance men did what they did because the vast majority of people were wage slaves and didn't have the interest in reading. On the other hand, the humanities is most invested in the Great Man model. Home Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-17T10:36:26-05:00. Jordan Peterson, again with a bit of reason number 1, spreads completely false pseudo-scientific claims such as that black people are genetically inferior to white people and therefore dumber than white people (Warning: Nazi Youtube channel, will poison your Youtube recommendations forever). The debate isn't about "whether post modern doctrines are true," but whether or not postmoderns are ungrateful and resentful. S4 E6: Gad Saad: Infectious Ideas February 16th, 2021 | This episode was recorded … Seit 1997 lehrt er Psychologie an der University of Toronto, seine Hauptforschungsgebiete sind die Psychologie des religiösen und ideologischen Glaubens sowie die Verbesserung der Persönlichkeit und Leistung.
What Benefits Are Available For Senior Citizens?, How Fast Is Saiki K, Aos Chaos Ring, Bank To Bank Transfer Limit, Where To Buy Royal Canin Hypoallergenic Cat Food, Www Craigslist Org Idaho, Smc Kansas City Stumo,